Skip to content

Settings and activity

12 results found

  1. 10 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    3 comments  ·  Obama CTO  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rjhancock commented  · 

    And how does taking away someones rights make for good policy? What if someone made it to where only military personal and veterans could vote. Not spouses, children of, or second cousins twice removed.

  2. 7,008 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    111 comments  ·  Obama CTO  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rjhancock commented  · 

    I would love the change. Maybe then I could actually figure out distance calculations without working about conversion errors.

    rjhancock supported this idea  · 
  3. 693 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    5 comments  ·  Obama CTO  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rjhancock commented  · 

    It needs to be opened up to allow those that may not be government apporved can still offer the services needed to make what needs to happen, happen.

    rjhancock supported this idea  · 
  4. 980 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    13 comments  ·  Obama CTO  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rjhancock commented  · 

    It would also allow those that understand the implications to comment and hopefully prevent some of the crap going on.

    rjhancock supported this idea  · 
  5. 63 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    4 comments  ·  Obama CTO  ·  Admin →
    rjhancock supported this idea  · 
  6. 0 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    2 comments  ·  Obama CTO  ·  Admin →
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    rjhancock commented  · 

    RFID is also proven to be insecure. When someone with a powerful enough transciever can stand 30 feet away and manipulate a tag, there are problems.

    RFID is best used for inventory control, not identification.

  7. 2,428 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    43 comments  ·  Obama CTO  ·  Admin →
    rjhancock supported this idea  · 
  8. 4,495 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    17 comments  ·  Obama CTO  ·  Admin →
    rjhancock supported this idea  · 
  9. 8,888 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    33 comments  ·  Obama CTO  ·  Admin →
    rjhancock supported this idea  · 
  10. 6,179 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    33 comments  ·  Obama CTO  ·  Admin →
    rjhancock supported this idea  · 
  11. 10,648 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    37 comments  ·  Obama CTO  ·  Admin →
    rjhancock supported this idea  · 
  12. 13,736 votes
    Vote

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    38 comments  ·  Obama CTO  ·  Admin →
    rjhancock supported this idea  ·