Complete the job on metrication that Ronald Reagan defunded
The government has failed to take the lead on completing the task of moving the country completely to the SI metric system. George H.W. Bush tried to do something about it, but gave the bureaucrats an easy out. Failure to follow the same measurement standards as the rest of the world is costing US industry something like $1 trillion per year.
-
Natalie commented
for the kids education sake and US future, please go metric as soon as possible!
Math and science education will be much more effective when metric system is used.
-
Coolcol commented
To quote Wikipedia "The International System of Units is the official system of measurement for all nations in the world except for Burma, Liberia, and the United States".
Think about that for a while....it's quite amusing /enlightening!
That would be enough for me to realise I'm in with the wrong crowd!
-
armageddonsaviour commented
Such a sorry state of affairs ...
In this matter,
FYI,
Indians are way ahead of America.
Whats that stupid plan that is proving so costly for Americans?
Indians want to know the reason.Cant you ppl become a little adaptive? with the world?
Or does America need nationwide Psycho Analysis? costing another $5tn?
Is that what you deserve?There has to be some cure for High Ego and Arrogance, especially, when it is a futile issue.
-
Kenneth R Leitch commented
As a fiscal conservative, engineer, and professor, I see tremendous value in switching to the metric (SI) standard for all US educational and business operations. We waste money and hamper international trade due to maintaining the antiquated and confusing US Customary System (USCS). If other English-speaking countries can make the switch in a relatively short period of time, so can the USA. I was a graduate student researcher at the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) in the mid to late '90s when we were going to make the switch for our nation's roads and it go killed in the TEA21 Act. Let's not be halfhearted, but rather, make the switch to metric (SI) in short period of time (say 5 years) across the board for the USA. We can do it if the UK, Canada, Australia, and Ireland can. Americans are a can-do people!
-
Bruce M. Herbertson III commented
Michael Glass, I agree completely. If we followed Australia's example we could convert in about 5 years. We are a good way there right now. What we need are members of Congress and the Senate that have back bones and stand firm and say we are going to do this for the sake of our country and our economy.
-
Michael Glass commented
America has nothing to fear from switching to the metric system. Australia made the change more than a generation ago without fuss. If Australia can do it, so can the United States.
-
Bruce M. Herbertson III commented
Has anyone heard of anything new that the government is doing toward finalising our metrication? I am hoping that there will be some sort talk at least by the end of the year. I keep checking my regular websites in hopes of seeing something new. Does anyone have any websites that could possible have any updates?
-
budaiendreistvan commented
As a pedagogue myself, I strongly believe that changing the USA to the metric system should begin with educating the educators. There are too many misconceptions floating around of the spelling, the pronunciation and the use of SI. I am willing to help training the trainers, but need to know where to start. budaiendreistvan@gmail.com
-
dwbrgs commented
The metric system is the language of scientific measurement. If we are compete in scientific and technologic development, we must join the rest of the world by changing to the metric system and learn to think in metric terms.
-
usma commented
In his Inaugural Address, President Obama stated, "For the world is changing, and we must change with it." Perhaps this statement of his basic orientation for American action will apply to the metric system. It certainly has been an argument of many that the U.S. join the rest of the world by changing over to metric. However,the decision to metric is ours.
-
Metric-Matters commented
SI units must be used; this includes kilojoules (kJ) and megajoules (MJ) for nutrition and food labeling – energy units. Calories/calories/kilocalories should be phased out as quickly as possible.
SI Metric-Matters -
Totakeke commented
You do have to register by email to vote, but it's a quick and easy process.
Make sure to tell your friends, family members, and anyone else who supports metrication to vote, because only the top 10 ideas go to Obama. Luckily, all of the votes reset to zero tomorrow so the second round is fair for everyone.
This could finally be our chance.
-
Totakeke commented
For those of you who don't know, the website change.org is doing something similar to this. People vote on ideas and the top ones go to Obama himself on inauguration day. There are 2 rounds of voting, and we made it through the first one (we made the top 3 in our entire category!) There is another round, beginning January 5th, and only the top 10 ideas go to Obama. (continued above)
-
usma commented
There should be ONE system of measurement--the metric system, in healthcare. But the only way we are going to have metric-only healthcare is to have a metric-only society in the U.S. Australia did it; so can we!
-
usma commented
Ultimately, it falls to pharmacists to make sure the body mass in kilograms, not the weight in pounds, is used in the calculation, and U.S. healthcare workers are aware of the need to use kilograms only. But, the problems continues in the U.S. because the DUALITY OF MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS continues. An error of this type is very unlikely, but I am certainly with you: it should never happen.
-
Bruce M. Herbertson III commented
USMA, that is scary just thinking about that. Which makes it all the more important for us to insist that our health care workers use metric only measures and make it understood that is what you want. Metric conversion at this point is not only a matter of improving our economy it is a matter of life and death.
-
usma commented
In medical records, the units used are always labeled. Even when the kilogram measurements are used alone, they are always labeled with the kilogram symbol. In my experience as a pharmacist, the danger comes when our non-metric CULTURE spills into the medical environment, i.e., someone fills in a space labeled "kg" with a value in pounds. The number "150" misunderstood results in an overdose.
-
Ametrica commented
I read an article a few years ago that the Mayo Clinic in Minnesota went fully metric because there were too many conversion errors. I wonder how it is working for them and how it affects record transfers and communications with other hospitals not fully metric. Somewhere this has to cause errors too. All medical data must be metric only. This would reduce lawsuits from errors too.
-
usma commented
A number of powerful drugs are dosed in milligrams per kilogram of patient body weight, or even according to meters of body surface area, called BSA (BSA is calculated using patient height and weight in metric units). If kilograms get mixed up with pounds, the patient may get a serious or even fatal overdose. The solution is simple: measure in metric only and SPEAK in metric only, in healthcare.
-
usma commented
I totally agree with these posts on using metric units only for patient height and weight! This is where the U.S.' non-metric society must be kept out of healthcare. Already, the Joint Commission has issued a guideline that all PEDIATRIC patients should be weighed in kilograms only; I wrote JC to urge that this move be extended to patients of all ages, and also include measuring height in meters.