Settings and activity
18 results found
-
10,648 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment -
1 vote
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
see also: "Adopt EFF's Innovation Agenda" <http://obamacto.uservoice.com/pages/general/suggestions/71893> - their agenda includes showing caution before regulating the use of technologies that limit consumer choice or consumer rights.
-
9 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
see also: "Adopt EFF's Innovation Agenda" <http://obamacto.uservoice.com/pages/general/suggestions/71893> - their agenda includes showing caution before regulating the use of technologies that limit consumer choice or consumer rights.
-
17 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
see also: "Adopt EFF's Innovation Agenda" <http://obamacto.uservoice.com/pages/general/suggestions/71893> - their agenda includes showing caution before regulating the use of technologies that limit consumer choice or consumer rights.
-
6 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
see also: "Adopt EFF's Innovation Agenda" <http://obamacto.uservoice.com/pages/general/suggestions/71893> - their agenda includes reforming the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO)
-
1,368 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
see also: "Adopt EFF's Innovation Agenda" <http://obamacto.uservoice.com/pages/general/suggestions/71893> - their agenda includes reforming the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO)
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
I support the intent of this idea, but we shouldn't even be using the term "intellectual property". See the <a href="http://www.fsf.org/licensing/essays/not-ipr.xhtml">Free Software Foundation's essay "Did You Say `Intellectual Property'? It's a Seductive Mirage"</a> for a good explanation of why this is bad.
-
3 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
see also: "Adopt EFF's Innovation Agenda" <http://obamacto.uservoice.com/pages/general/suggestions/71893> - their agenda includes reforming the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO)
-
7 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
see also: "Adopt EFF's Innovation Agenda" <http://obamacto.uservoice.com/pages/general/suggestions/71893> - their agenda includes reforming the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO)
-
20 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
see also: "Adopt EFF's Innovation Agenda" <http://obamacto.uservoice.com/pages/general/suggestions/71893> - their agenda includes reforming the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO)
-
8,888 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
See also: "Adopt EFF's Innovation Agenda" (http://obamacto.uservoice.com/pages/general/suggestions/71893). It includes repairing the DMCA.
pmocek supported this idea ·
-
15 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
Let's be more specific. EFF is concerned with many things outside the concern of CTOOTUS. Recently, they've published a series of proposed agendas for the new administration: A privacy agenda, an innovation agenda, and a transparency agenda. It seems that the innovation agenda is specifically and completely relevant to CTOOTUS. See: http://obamacto.uservoice.com/pages/general/suggestions/71893
-
28 votes
pmocek shared this idea ·
-
6,179 votes
pmocek supported this idea ·
-
2,906 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
This is absolutely essential.
pmocek supported this idea ·
-
74 votes
pmocek supported this idea ·
-
147 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment pmocek commented
We should do more than just decriminalize it; we should legalize it. But this is not related to a national CTO's duties.
-
13,736 votes
pmocek supported this idea ·
-
2,428 votes
pmocek supported this idea ·
This is vitally important, but it is not seem to be in the area of responsibility of a CTOOTUS.